The argument of the relationship between the artist and the critic has been long debated. Many have asked: are critics helpful or detrimental in promoting an artist’s quality of work? On one hand, criticism, when used constructively, can be used as a tool to analyze the strength and weaknesses of an artist which could lead to the betterment of the artist’s skills. It can also provide new perspective and view of looking at an artist’s works. However, on the other hand, criticism can undermine and constraint the artist’s confidence and creativity which could lead to poor work quality.
Criticism does not necessarily have to have a negative effect on artists and their work. After all, who is the artist trying to sell and expose his or her art to? The public. The critics represent nothing more than the voice of the public evaluating the work and the marketability of the artist. The criticism or praise garnered can be used as tool by the artist to analyze their strengths and weaknesses. It is undeniable that evaluating one’s own work is not an easy thing because personal bias and ego would come into play. This is where an external opinion from an impartial party comes in; the criticism or praise received can be used to build on the artist’s strengths or as an indication for the artist to work on their weaknesses in certain areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment